This paper proposes a down-sampled discrete-time internal-model-based controller in the synchronous reference frame with a reduced number of poles. This controller is suitable for three-phase pulsewidth modulation inverters with output transformer for double-conversion uninterruptible power supply applications. It is demonstrated that the use of a down-sampled rate and fewer poles in the internal model results in a number of benefits, among which are the following: 1) improvement of the transient response; 2) increase of the stability margin of the closed-loop system; 3) a straightforward implementation in fixed-point digital signal processor (DSP) and microcontroller implementation as well as a reduction of the required memory space; and 4) a simple solution for the saturation of the output transformer. As a result, it is possible to obtain output voltages with reduced total harmonic distortion while ensuring good transient performance for both linear and nonlinear loads. To confirm the advantages claimed for the proposed synchronous reference dq frame internal-model-based controller and to demonstrate the steady-state and transient performance under the test conditions of the International electrotechnical commission standard 62040-3, the experimental results from a 10-kVA space-vector-modulated three-phase inverter, which is fully controlled by a DSP TMS320F241, are presented.
Figures - uploaded by Fernando Botteron
Author content
All figure content in this area was uploaded by Fernando Botteron
Content may be subject to copyright.
Discover the world's research
- 20+ million members
- 135+ million publications
- 700k+ research projects
Join for free
2120 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 54, NO. 4, AUGUST 2007
A Three-Phase UPS That Complies
With the Standard IEC 62040-3
Fernando Botterón and Humberto Pinheiro
Abstract—This paper proposes a down-sampled discrete-time
internal-model-based controller in the synchronous reference
frame with a reduced number of poles. This controller is suit-
able for three-phase pulsewidth modulation inverters with output
transformer for double-conversion uninterruptible power supply
applications. It is demonstrated that the use of a down-sampled
rate and fewer poles in the internal model results in a number
of benefits, among which are the following: 1) improvement of
the transient response; 2) increase of the stability margin of
the closed-loop system; 3) a straightforward implementation in
fixed-point digital signal processor (DSP) and microcontroller
implementation as well as a reduction of the required mem-
ory space; and 4) a simple solution for the saturation of the
output transformer. As a result, it is possible to obtain output
voltages with reduced total harmonic distortion while ensuring
good transient performance for both linear and nonlinear loads.
To confirm the advantages claimed for the proposed synchro-
nous reference dq frame internal-model-based controller and to
demonstrate the steady-state and transient performance under the
test conditions of the International Electrotechnical Commission
Standard 62040-3, the experimental results from a 10-kVA
space-vector-modulated three-phase inverter, which is fully con-
trolled by a DSP TMS320F241, are presented.
Index Terms—Digital control, discrete-time control, internal
model principle, power transformers, uninterruptible power
systems (UPSs).
I. I NTRODUCTION
T
HE USE of uncontrolled rectifiers within critical loads,
e.g., in computers and medical equipment, requires unin-
terruptible power supplies (UPSs) that are capable of maintain-
ing low total harmonic distortion (THD) at the output voltages
even under highly distorted load currents [1]. These types of
loads distort the UPS output voltages as a result of unbalanced
nonlinear currents drawn by them, thus causing voltage drops
across the output inductance–capacitance (LC ) filter, which is
used to attenuate the pulsewidth-modulation (PWM) inverter
high-frequency harmonics. This becomes a concern in medium-
and high-power UPS, where the switching frequency is low
to limit the switching losses. Other factors also contribute to
UPS output voltage distortion. Among them are the inherent
Manuscript received November 7, 2005; revised February 28, 2006. This
work was supported in part by CAPES and in part by CNPq.
F. Botterón is with the Departamento de Electrónica, Facultad de Ingeniería,
Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Obera 3360, Argentina (e-mail: botteron@
gmail.com).
H. Pinheiro is with the Power Electronics and Control Research Group,
Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil (e-mail:
humberto@ctlab.ufsm.br).
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this paper are available online
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TIE.2007.894782
nonlinearities of the PWM inverter, fluctuations of the dc
bus voltage, and power semiconductor voltage drops. More-
over, transformerless UPSs are susceptible to interference from
spikes and transients caused by assorted devices connected to
the utility grid. These interferences, transferred through the
UPS to the load, reduce the UPS output voltage quality. Thus,
UPSs with output transformer provide a safer and more robust
solution than transformerless UPSs since the transformer offers
a galvanic isolation to the load from undesirable disturbances
of the main supply [2].
In digitally controlled systems, quantization of the analog-
to-digital converters, digital PWMs, and roundoff resulting
from fixed-point arithmetic can generate errors that result in
a dc component at the inverter output voltage. These errors,
added to the inevitable nonideal features of real live circuit
implementation and amplified by an inappropriate selection
of the controller, can lead the output transformer to saturate,
degrading the overall performance of the system [13]–[15]. It is
important to point out that a standard such as the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62040-3 recommends that
the output voltage dc component shall be less than 0.1% of
its root mean square (rms) rated value and specifies that the
distortion factor "D" of sinusoidal UPS output voltages must
to be less than 8%. To deal with these issues, many discrete-
time control structures for single-phase and three-phase UPSs
are reported in the literature.
With the well-known Repetitive Controller [4]–[6], which
is established on the internal model principle [3], several
high-performance approaches have been proposed to achieve
high-quality output voltages in three-phase and single-phase
PWM inverters [7]–[23]. Reference [7] proposes a discrete-
time control strategy using a repetitive controller extended
to a proportional–integral (PI) compensator structure in sta-
tionary αβ frame to compensate voltage distortions due to
nonlinear and unbalanced loads. The steady-state performance
is improved by using a 30th-order low-pass finite-impulse
response (FIR) filter after implementing the measures to at-
tenuate the high-frequency components so that the voltage
error contains only lower frequencies. However, the proposal
referenced above presents a cancellation issue: the zero at
z =1 (in the discrete-time domain) of the plant introduced
by the transformer cancels with the pole at z =1 of the
repetitive controller, which violates the internal model principle
[3], as demonstrated in [15]. This problem may eventually
lead the transformer to saturation. In [9], the modified plug-
in repetitive controller combined with the conventional One-
sampling-ahead preview compensator in stationary αβ frame
has been reported to improve the output voltage distortion when
0278-0046/$25.00 © 2007 IEEE
BOTTERÓN AND PINHEIRO: THREE-PHASE UPS THAT COMPLIES WITH THE STANDARD IEC 62040-3 2121
Fig. 1. Three-phase PWM inverter, ∆Y transformer, filter, and load.
three-phase rectifier loads are connected at the UPS output.
However, in this case, the output transformer is not considered.
Therefore, connecting an insulating transformer at the inverter
output, a pole–zero cancellation occurs with the plug-in repet-
itive controller in closed loop. In [10], the author proposes
a two-layer voltage controller scheme in synchronous frame
with a PI regulator to ensure zero steady-state error at the
fundamental frequency and a repetitive-based controller with a
high-pass filter to compensate for the harmonics at the inverter
output voltages. However, inadequate choices of the high-pass
filter cutoff frequency may result in dc components that can
saturate the transformer at the inverter output. Moreover, the
repetitive controller with a high-pass filter produces pole–zero
cancellation, which may lead to output transformer saturation.
Other solutions that are also based on the internal model
principle were presented in [11] and [12]. In [11], a three-
layer control scheme is proposed. It consists of a proportional
compensator in stationary αβ frame, an integral controller in
synchronous frame to compensate the fundamental component,
and a selective harmonic compensator in stationary frame based
on a passband FIR filter with unit gain and zero phase at
the selected harmonics. Reference [12] proposes a robust con-
troller based on the passivity theory framework for three-phase
UPS. This controller guarantees asymptotic stability with good
steady-state performance for nonlinear and unbalanced loads.
Although the controllers proposed in [11] and [12] may be ad-
equate solutions for reducing distortion in output voltages and
for operating with an insulating transformer, the computational
requirements to implement them increase significantly with
the number of compensating harmonics. In addition, since the
controller coefficients are not integer numbers, this controller
is sensitive to quantization and roundoff errors, and as a result,
the tracking at selected harmonics is compromised. References
[18] and [19] propose a down-sampled repetitive controller in
synchronous frame with reduced number of poles, which only
compensate odd harmonics in stationary frame. This controller
gives reduced THD output voltages of a three-phase UPS. It
also makes it possible to solve the output transformer satu-
ration; still more due to the slower sampling rate, it is not
necessary to include a zero-phase-shift low-pass FIR filter [6] to
improve the robustness of the closed-loop system. On the other
hand, [20] proposes an odd-harmonic digital repetitive plug-
in controller to reject these kinds of disturbances in stationary
frame. This odd-harmonic repetitive controller does not have
a pole at z =1 , so it is suitable for operating with an output
transformer. However, a low-pass FIR filter must be included
in the periodic signal generator loop to reduce the repetitive
frequency gains, and this consequently increases the closed-
loop system robustness. As a result, this filter compromises
tracking and disturbance rejection.
On the other hand, it is important to emphasize that few
papers explore the UPS transient behaviors. Moreover, few
papers explore the controller transient behaviors using the
discrete-time internal model principle. Hence, to obtain output
voltages with reduced THD and an improved load transient,
this paper proposes a down-sampled internal-model-based con-
troller in synchronous reference frame with a reduced number
of poles. This internal-model-based controller acts together
with a proportional–derivative (PD) predictive compensator,
which has the function to stabilize the closed-loop system. This
compensator results in a simple form for digital implementation
and only requires the measure of the UPS output voltage [15],
[23]. The main feature of the proposed internal-model-based
controller is that it is a straightforward solution for output
transformer saturation. In addition, the reduced number of poles
of the proposed internal model in synchronous frame improves
the transient performance for linear and nonlinear loads as well
as enhancing the stability margin of the closed-loop system.
Thus, it is demonstrated that the transient performance with
the proposed controller can be improved by satisfying the
rigorous output dynamic performance classification 1 of the
standard IEC 62040-3, which classifies UPS by performance.
To demonstrate the advantages claimed, the proposed discrete-
time controller structure is digitally implemented in a 16-bit
fixed-point digital signal processor (DSP), and experimental
results in steady state and transient conditions from a 10-kVA
prototype are given.
II. S
YSTEM D ESCRIPTION
A typical double-conversion UPS power circuit is shown in
Fig. 1. Among the three-phase inverter configurations, the one
2122 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 54, NO. 4, AUGUST 2007
shown is a strong candidate since: 1) it provides galvanic iso-
lation to the load; 2) it allows the output voltage to be selected
according to customer needs; and 3) it provides a neutral by
the delta-star (∆Y) connection. The dc-bus voltage is almost
constant and supplied by a six-pulse three-phase uncontrolled
diode rectifier, which provides energy to the inverter in normal
operation mode. The dc-to-ac conversion is accomplished by
a space-vector-modulated three-phase three-leg inverter with
insulated-gate bipolar transistor. The high-frequency harmonics
introduced by the modulation are attenuated by the LC filter. It
is important to point out that the filter inductors are located at
the transformer primary side so as not to introduce distortions
in the output voltages that result from zero-sequence voltages
produced by unbalanced load currents, which will be shorted
on the delta connection at the transformer primary side [15].
Since this inverter is not capable of controlling zero-sequence
voltages, it is important to minimize the zero-sequence im-
pedance to reduce the distortions in the output voltages. Hence,
the topology in Fig. 1 offers a degree of freedom to minimize
the zero sequence impedance.
III. T
HREE-P HASE PWM I NVERTER, ∆Y T RANSFORMER,
F
ILTER, AND L OAD M ODEL
A. Stationary Frame Model
From the circuit in Fig. 1, the dynamic equations of the
inverter, transformer, filter, and load can be obtained by ap-
plying Kirchhoff's laws. To simplify the system modeling, it
is considered that the leakage inductances of the primary and
secondary sides of the transformer are lumped at the secondary
side. The coil resistances are also neglected. The following
equations are then obtained:
u
12
u
23
u
31
=
2L +
ML
d
M + L
d
−L −L
−L 2L +
ML
d
M +L
d
−L
−L −L 2L +
ML
d
M +L
d
d
dt
i
ab
i
bc
i
ca
+
M
M + L
d
v
an
v
bn
v
cn
(1)
d
dt
i
as
i
bs
i
cs
=
M
M + L
d
d
dt
i
ab
i
bc
i
ca
−
1
M + L
d
v
as
v
bs
v
cs
(2)
˙ v
an
˙ v
bn
˙ v
cn
=
1
C
i
as
i
bs
i
cs
−
1
C
i
oa
i
ob
i
oc
. (3)
In these equations, M is the mutual inductance, L is the filter
inductance, L
d
is the equivalent leakage inductance, and C
is
the filter capacitance. In addition, u
12
, u
23
, and u
31
are the line-
to-line PWM voltages produced by the inverter; v
an
, v
bn
, and
v
cn
, and i
oa
, i
ob
, and i
oc
are the phase-to-neutral voltages and
load currents referred to the transformer primary side; and i
ab
,
i
bc
, and i
ca
are the phase current in the delta connection.
B. Synchronous Reference Frame State-Space Model
Transforming (1)–(3) to αβ and then to synchronous frame
as in [25], using the linear transformations given in the
Appendix, the state-space model is given by
˙
x
dq
(t )=
A
dq
x
dq
(t )+ B
dq
u
dq
+ F
dq
w
dq
, where the matrices A
dq
,
B
dq
, and F
dq
are given as
A
dq
=
0 − ω 00 − M/D 0
ω 00 0 0 − M/D
00 0 − ω − (3L + M ) /D 0
00 ω 00 − (3L + M ) /D
001 /C 00 − ω
00 0 1 /C ω 0
B
dq
=
(M + L
d
)/D 0
0( M + L
d
)/D
M/D 0
0 M/D
00
00
F
dq
=
00
00
00
00
− 1/C 0
0 − 1/C
. (4)
The state vector has been selected as x
dq
(t )=
[i
dp
i
qp
i
ds
i
qs
v
d
v
q
]
T
, and the input and disturbance
vectors as u
dq
(t )=[ u
d
u
q
]
T
and w
dq
(t )=[ i
od
i
oq
]
T
,
respectively. In these matrices, D is defined as D =3 LM +
3LL
d
+ ML
d
.
From (1), it is seen that the voltages applied at the trans-
former input are the line-to-line voltages produced by the
inverter. To avoid an additional transformation from line-to-
line to phase voltages that must be performed in the DSP, the
space vector modulation is accomplished using the line-to-line
voltages referred above.
C. Synchronous Reference Frame Discrete-Time Model
To obtain a discrete-time model for the discrete-time con-
troller design, the synchronous frame state equation in the
continuous time domain obtained above is solved throughout a
sampling period T . For this purpose, it is considered that the
control action u
dq
(t) remains constant in a sampling period
T . Thus, the discrete-time state-space equation of the plant
that takes into account the delay of a digital implementation is
given by
x
dq
(k +1) T
u
dq_ d
(k +1) T
=
GH
0
00
x
dq
(kT )
u
dq_ d
(kT )
+
H
1
I
u
dq
(kT ).
(5)
In (5), the additional state variable u
dq_ d
represents the
delayed control action that models the real-time digital
BOTTERÓN AND PINHEIRO: THREE-PHASE UPS THAT COMPLIES WITH THE STANDARD IEC 62040-3 2123
Fig. 2. Timing chart of DSP controller. T
pwm
: switching period. T : sampling period and PD compensator computing period. T
d
: time delay. T
im
: internal-
model-based controller computing period. T
im
=2 T ,andT
d
= T .
implementation delay, and the matrices G, H
0
, and H
1
are
given as
G = e
A
dq
T
H
0
= e
A
dq
(T −T
d
)
A
−1
dq
(e
A
dq
T
d
− I)B
dq
H
1
= A
−1
dq
e
A
dq
(T −T
d
)
− I
B
dq
(6)
where T
d
is the time delay mentioned above, which is related
to a given DSP implementation.
It is important to note that to obtain (5), the sampling of
the variables of interest and the updating of the control law
are performed as shown in the timing chart of Fig. 2. With
this sampling scheme, it is possible to use a low switching
frequency to limit the switching losses while preserving an
acceptable sampling frequency. Also, since sampling is carried
out at zero vectors, the resulting low-frequency harmonics over
the sampled data are reduced when compared with one sample
per sampling period [24].
Since the discrete-time controller proposed here is modeled
using an input–output approach, it is useful to obtain the
input–output description of the plant, which can be found from
(5), by applying the Z transform. Strictly speaking, since the
plant represented by (5) is multiple-input–multiple-output, it is
obtained a sampled transfer function matrix of the system, i.e.,
G
p
(z )= C
dq
(z I − G
dq
)
−1
H
dq
+ D
dq
(7)
where
G
dq
=
GH
0
00
H
dq
=
H
1
I
C
dq
=[ 0
2×4
I
2×2
0
2×2
]
D
dq
=[ 0
2×2
] . (8)
In this case, the resulting sampled transfer function matrix
can be written as
G
p
(z )=
g
1
(z ) g
2
(z )
−g
2
(z ) g
1
(z )
(9)
where the sampled transfer functions g
1
(z ) and g
2
(z ) are given
by the proper rational functions
g
1
(z )=
b
0
z
4
+ b
1
z
3
+ b
2
z
2
+ b
3
z + b
4
z
5
− a
1
z
4
+ a
2
z
3
− a
3
z
2
+ a
4
z
g
2
(z )=
−c
0
z
4
− c
1
z
3
− c
2
z
2
+ c
3
z + c
4
z
5
− a
1
z
4
+ a
2
z
3
− a
3
z
2
+ a
4
z
. (10)
Note that (9) shows that the system presents a cross coupling
given by the transfer functions g
2
(z ) and −g
2
(z ). In order
to simplify the controller design, is useful to work with a
single-input–single-output (SISO) system. It is shown that the
influence of the cross transfer functions is negligible, or in
another words, the system is weakly coupled. It is possible to
see in Fig. 3 that for a large variation in frequency, the transfer
function g
2
(z ) significantly attenuates the output v
q
when an
input signal in u
d
is applied or vice versa. Hence, the system can
be treated as a SISO control problem with a transfer function
given by g
1
(z ) without significantly affecting the closed-loop
performance.
In order to define a proper discrete-time voltage controller for
the plant described by g
1
(z ), upon the internal model principle
foundation, it is important to show the impact that the zeros of
the plant have in the selection of the controller structure. Fig. 4
shows the zeros of g
1
(z ).
Fig. 4 shows that this plant presents a pair of zeros at the fun-
damental frequency in synchronous frame, which is associated
with the insulating transformer. These zeros indicate that the
transformer does not transfer the dc component to its output.
This means that an inadequate selection of the discrete-time
2124 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 54, NO. 4, AUGUST 2007
Fig. 3. Frequency responses of g
1
(z ) and g
2
(z ). T = 198 . 41 µs.
Fig. 4. Zero map of the input–output-sampled transfer function of the
plant g
1
(z ).
controller may produce a pole–zero cancellation, which causes
any residual dc component from the digital implementation
to be amplified, which in turn may lead the transformer to
saturate, as demonstrated in [15]. To avoid this problem, a new
discrete-time voltage controller in synchronous frame based on
the internal model principle, and adequate for the system in
Fig. 1, will be described in the next section.
IV. P
ROPOSED D ISCRETE-T IME I NTERNAL-M ODEL-B ASED
C ONTROLLER IN S YNCHRONOUS R EFERENCE F RAME
This section develops the proposed discrete-time voltage
controller based on the internal model principle in synchronous
reference frame. Let us consider the design problem of a SISO
Fig. 5. Discrete-time feedback SISO LTI system.
linear time-invariant (LTI) system in the discrete-time domain
shown in Fig. 5, where the strictly proper transfer function of
the plant is given by g
1
(z ). The problem is to design a controller
with a proper transfer function g
c
(z ) so that the feedback
system is asymptotically stable and meets the specifications of
zero error tracking in steady state even with disturbance signals
present in the plant.
The design procedure, which was developed from the inter-
nal model principle theory presented in [15] for discrete-time
systems, can be summarized in two steps: 1) introduction of
1/φ(z ), a model of the reference and disturbance signals inside
the loop, where φ(z ) is the least common denominator of the
unstable poles of r (z ) and w(z ) and 2) stabilization of the
feedback system using a conventional compensator. It must be
emphasized that neither root of the internal model φ(z ) must be
a zero of the transfer function of the plant so as to ensure the
exact cancellations of the unstable modes of the reference and
disturbance signals.
A. Proposed Internal Model
With the aim of defining an adequate internal model for the
plant g
1
(z ), five candidate internal models are presented below.
Fig. 6 shows the pole map of a discrete-time internal model
that is often used in conventional repetitive controllers [5].
When this internal model is implemented in stationary frame,
the pole at z =1 is cancelled with the zero of the plant at
the same location. On the other hand, if this internal model
BOTTERÓN AND PINHEIRO: THREE-PHASE UPS THAT COMPLIES WITH THE STANDARD IEC 62040-3 2125
Fig. 6. Pole map. Internal model of the conventional repetitive controller [5].
T = 198.41 µs, and 1 /φ (z )=1 /(z
N
− 1) .
Fig. 7. Pole map. Internal model with poles at odd multiples of 60 Hz.
T = 198.41 µs, and 1 /φ (z )=1 /(z
N/2
+1) .
is implemented in synchronous frame, the same pole–zero
cancellation occurs at 60 Hz. So this particular internal model
is inappropriate for this application as demonstrated in the
experimental result of Fig. 20. It can be seen that the output
phase voltages have the desired levels with a low THD, but
the currents at the transformer primary side appear with a
significant offset, which increases continuously, shutting down
the PWM inverter as a result of overcurrents.
Fig. 7 shows a discrete internal model with poles at frequen-
cies that are odd multiples of 60 Hz, while Fig. 8 presents an
internal model with poles at frequencies that are even multiples
of 60 Hz. These internal models have been employed in three-
phase UPS controllers [18], [19] as well as in an odd-harmonic
repetitive controller [20] for single-phase applications [21],
[22]. When the internal model in Fig. 8 is implemented in
Fig. 8. Pole map. Internal model with poles at even multiples of 60 Hz.
T = 198.41 µs, and 1 /φ
dq
(z )=1 /(z
N/2
− 1) .
Fig. 9. Pole map. Internal model with reduced number of poles.
T = 198.41 µs.
synchronous frame, there is no pole–zero cancellation with the
plant. Similarly, the pole–zero cancellation is not a concern
for the internal model of Fig. 7 in stationary frame. On the
other hand, when operating with low switching frequencies, it
is desirable to keep the sampling frequency as high as possible
to improve the closed-loop performance. Usually, T
pwm
=2 T .
In this case, the high gains of the poles close to the Nyquist
frequency may lead to system instability. In order to overcome
this limitation, a zero-phase-shift low-pass FIR filter can be
included [6] to improve the robustness at high frequencies.
However, this filter will increase the tracking error and com-
promise disturbance rejection.
Fig. 9, on the other hand, presents an internal model with a
reduced number of poles. In this case, the internal model has
been chosen to compensate the fundamental and the harmonics
2126 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 54, NO. 4, AUGUST 2007
Fig. 10. Internal model with reduced number of poles and roundoff error in
coefficients. T = 198 .41 µ s.
Fig. 11. Pole map of the proposed internal model in synchronous frame.
N = T
1
/2 T , T
1
=1 /60 , T = 198.41 µs, T
im
=2 T ,and1/φ
dq
(z
im
)=
1/(z
N/2
im
− 1) .
from 2nd to 7th. Note that it is possible to include more poles
if desired. This internal model is adequate for the system in
Fig. 1 since it does not cancel the zeros of g
1
(z ). However, the
poles of this internal model are sensitive to roundoff errors in
the polynomial coefficients, which are a concern in fixed-point
arithmetic implementation. As a result, the pole location of
the internal model can be significantly modified, as illustrated
in Fig. 10.
Based on the internal models presented above, and having
considered them inadequate for the system in Fig. 1, we now
propose a suitable discrete-time internal model for the plant
g
1
(z ). The pole map of the proposed internal model in syn-
chronous frame is shown in Fig. 11. This internal model has
half the poles of the internal model shown in Fig. 8, and no
root of φ
dq
(z
im
) is a zero of the plant. Also, this proposed
internal model is computed with a reduced sampling rate. As
a result, the Nyquist frequency of the internal-model-based
controller is smaller than the first set of harmonics generated
by the switching operation of the PWM inverter, i.e., there are
no internal model poles in the model uncertainty region of the
plant. Note that this internal model results in a reduced compu-
tational effort controller without the roundoff error of the fixed-
point implementation since the coefficients of its polynomial
are integer numbers. Therefore, we propose here a discrete-time
control structure with a faster loop at a sampling period T to
keep a satisfactory sampling rate and a down-sampled internal-
model-based controller. This results in a multirate closed-loop
system, as presented in Fig. 12.
From the two-step design procedure presented at the begin-
ning of this section, the proposed internal-model-based con-
troller, which operate at a sampling period T
im
=2 T , can be
included in the closed loop. To complete the internal-model-
based controller design, the numerator N
im
(z ) of the transfer
function G
im
(z ) shown in Fig. 12 must be selected. To avoid
compromising the simplicity of this controller being consid-
ered, this numerator can be selected as N
im
(z
im
)=k
im
z
d
im
.As
a result, the sampled transfer function of this controller can be
written as
G
im
(z
im
)=
N
im
(z
im
)
φ
dq
(z
im
)
, where φ
dq
(z
im
)=z
N/2
im
− 1. (11)
In this transfer function, the controller gain k
im
determines
the convergence time of the voltage error to zero, and the pa-
rameter d is the time advance step size used to compensate the
closed-loop phase at high frequencies [23]. These parameters
must be chosen to ensure the asymptotic stability of the closed
loop and to meet a desired performance.
The next step is to design the conventional compensator
G
c
(z ) to stabilize the closed loop with the plant G
p
(z )= g
1
(z ).
In this case, a predictive PD compensator has been selected
whose proper transfer function G
c
(z ) is given as
G
c
(z )= k
1
z
−1
+ k
2
z
−2
. (12)
This compensator has been selected mainly for its simple
structure, which only requires the measurement of the phase
to neutral output voltages. In addition, it provides a significant
phase and gain margin to the closed-loop system. The predictive
PD controller gains k
1
and k
2
are determined by placement
of the dominant poles of the closed-loop system [23]. It is
important to point out that the tandem connection of G
c
(z )
with G
p
(z ) is completely characterized by the proper transfer
function G
c
(z )G
p
(z ) since there is no pole–zero cancellation
between G
c
(z ) and G
p
(z ), as established in [15].
B. Stability Analysis
Since the closed-loop system operates with two different
sampling rates, the stability analysis can be performed in
two steps.
Step 1: The closed-loop stability of the tandem connection of
the plant with the PD compensator must be ensured. This faster
BOTTERÓN AND PINHEIRO: THREE-PHASE UPS THAT COMPLIES WITH THE STANDARD IEC 62040-3 2127
Fig. 12. Control structure of the proposed closed-loop multirate SISO discrete-time voltage controller in synchronous frame for axis "d ." z = e
Ts
,and
z
im
= e
T
im
s
.
Fig. 13. Closed-loop system. Tandem connection of the plant plus predictive PD compensator.
Fig. 14. Nyquist plot of G
c
(z )G
p
(z ). k
1
=0 .12 , k
2
= −0. 08,andT =
198.41 µ s.
loop operates with a sampling period T , which results in the
control structure shown in Fig. 13.
To ensure the closed-loop asymptotic stability of the sys-
tem represented in Fig. 13, the roots of the polynomial 1+
G
c
(z )G
p
(z )=0must be inside the unit circle. To demonstrate
that this closed loop is stable, the Nyquist plot of the open-loop
transfer function G
c
(z )G
p
(z ) can be used, as shown in Fig. 14.
It can be seen that the tandem connection of G
p
(z ) with G
c
(z )
has a large gain margin, which in this case is about 16 dB, and
an infinite phase margin. Therefore, the closed-loop system in
Fig. 13 is asymptotically stable.
Step 2: This step is to ensure the overall stability when the
proposed internal-model-based controller (11) is introduced. To
extend the previous stability criteria to the multirate controller
Fig. 15. Single-rate equivalent of the multirate closed-loop system with a
sampling period T
im
.
system in Fig. 12, we transform it to an equivalent system
sampled at slower rate T
im
. As a result, the equivalent closed-
loop system becomes as that shown in Fig. 15.
The sampled transfer function of the equivalent slow-rate
plant G
MF
(z
im
) can be found from the equivalent slow-rate
state-space representation of the plant and PD compensator,
which is given in the Appendix. This transfer function can be
expressed as
G
MF
(z
im
)
=
n
0
z
6
im
− n
1
z
5
im
− n
2
z
4
im
+ n
3
z
3
im
− n
4
z
2
im
+ n
5
z
im
z
7
im
− d
1
z
6
im
− d
2
z
5
im
+ d
3
z
4
im
+ d
4
z
3
im
− d
5
z
2
im
+ d
6
z
im
− d
7
.
(13)
The closed-loop stability of the tandem connection of
G
im
(z
im
) with G
MF
(z
im
) can be proved using the Nyquist
criterion plots of the open-loop transfer function, i.e.,
G
im
(z
im
)G
MF
(z
im
). Fig. 16 shows the Nyquist plot for
N =42 , k
im
=1 , and d =1 . It can be seen that the closed-loop
system with an internal-model-based controller remains stable
with a significant gain and phase margin.
To demonstrate the benefit of performing the proposed
discrete-time down-sampled internal-model-based controller,
2128 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 54, NO. 4, AUGUST 2007
Fig. 16. Nyquist plot of G(z
im
)=G
im
(z
im
)G
MF
(z
im
). N =42 ,and
T
im
= 396.82 µs.
Fig. 17. Nyquist plot of the single-rate system operating at lower sampling
frequency. G(z )=G
im
(z )G
p
(z )/ (1 + G
p
(z )G
c
(z )) , N =42 , k
im
=1 ,
d =1 ,andT = 396.82 µ s.
the Nyquist plot of the closed-loop system in Fig. 12, which op-
erates with a single rate at lower sampling frequency, is shown
in Fig. 17. It can be seen that the gain margin stays almost
the same if compared with the gain margin in Fig. 16, but the
phase margin decreases significantly when the system operates
at a single rate. Therefore, the stability margin of the proposed
multirate system in Fig. 12 is significantly bigger than the
single-rate system at lower sampling frequency, which therefore
represents the benefit of the proposed multirate controller.
Concerning digital implementation, by applying the inverse
Z -transform to (12) and (11), we can obtain the respective re-
cursive difference equations of the predictive PD controller and
the proposed down-sampled internal-model-based controller as
u
cd
(kT )= k
1
e
d
(k − 1) + k
2
e
d
(k − 2) (14)
u
imd
(mT
im
)= k
im
e
d
[mT
im
− (N/ 2) + d]
+ u
imd
[mT
im
− (N/ 2)] . (15)
From Fig. 12, we can see that the control law applied to the
plant is given by
u
d
(kT )= u
cd
(kT )+ u
imd
(mT
im
). (16)
Note that (14)–(16) are written for the axis "d "; therefore,
similar equations can be written for the axis "q ." Regarding the
gain, k
im
must be selected to guarantee a fast convergence of
the voltage error to zero, maintaining the closed-loop system
stability. The values of k
im
and d are given in Table II. It
is important to emphasize here that simplicity is a significant
advantage of the proposed controller if compared with the
controller presented in [11]. It becomes clear by realizing that
the proposed internal-model-based controller implementation
is just (15). In fixed-point arithmetic, the quantization and
rounding errors may result in roots of the polynomial internal
model to be quite different from the desired one (see Fig. 10).
However, since the proposed internal-model-based controller
polynomial coefficients are 1s or 0s, the internal model roots
have low sensitivity to these errors. This is another advantage if
compared with the controllers of [11, eq. (9)] and [12, eq. (27)].
V. S
TEADY-S TATE AND D YNAMIC O UTPUT V OLTAGE
C HARACTERISTICS OF THE UPS
The UPS output specifications according to IEC 62040-3
must have output voltage dynamic performance characteristics
not exceeding the limits in [1, Figs. 1, 2, or 3] for the application
of increasing/decreasing load steps under linear and reference
nonlinear load for the test conditions in Section 6.3 of this
standard. The objective of classifying UPS by performance is
to provide a common base on which all UPS manufacturer and
supplier data are to be compared. This enables purchasers of
equipment with similar UPS power ratings to compare products
from different manufacturers under the same measurement
conditions.
A. Reference Nonlinear Load Steps in Normal Mode
Step nonlinear loading is defined as the application of the
test circuit, which is shown in Fig. 18, for dissipating the
required steady-state output active power for the percentage
load step relative to the rated steady-state output active power
of the UPS. The load circuit is then first deenergized before
application so that its capacitor voltage starts from zero voltage
when applied to the UPS output. To determine the UPS output
dynamic performance, the deviation from the under/overvoltage
limits defined [1] must be obtained. Then, using the test circuit
in Fig. 18, the required step loads (33% of the rated output
apparent power) must be applied or reduced in accordance
with those in [1, Section 6.3.8.5] monitoring the load capacitor
voltage. The capacitor voltage changes should remain within
the stated tolerances in [1, Figs. 1 or 2, Section 5.3.1]. In
Fig. 18, U
c
is the rectified voltage, R
1
is the load resistor set
to dissipate an active power equal to 66% of the total apparent
power, and R
s
is a series line resistor set to dissipate an active
power equal to 4% of the total apparent power. The procedure
BOTTERÓN AND PINHEIRO: THREE-PHASE UPS THAT COMPLIES WITH THE STANDARD IEC 62040-3 2129
Fig. 18. Reference nonlinear load test [1].
Fig. 19. Resistive load test [1].
for calculating the passive elements of this reference nonlinear
load is described in [1, Annex E].
B. Linear Load Steps
With the UPS operating in normal mode, a resistive load
equal to 100% of the output active power must be applied in
two steps using the circuit in Fig. 19: one equal to 20% and one
equal to 80%. The step must be performed at the peak value of
the output waveform. Similarly, unloading must be measured
by reducing the load to 20% of the rated output active power by
switching off the 80% load. In both cases, the output waveform
must be observed and stored so as to permit calculation of any
dynamic performance deviation. This deviation is referred as
the rms value above or below the rated value, which is obtained
on a successive half-cycle by half-cycle. The computed values
of this dynamic deviation must remain within the stated limits
in [1, Figs. 1, 2, or 3, Section 5.3.1].
VI. E
XPERIMENTAL R ESULTS
The circuit in Fig. 1 has been tested experimentally to
verify the proposed discrete-time-voltage internal-model-based
controller using a DSP TMS320F241 to control a 10-kVA
UPS. The steady-state load tests have been performed using
resistive linear loads and nonlinear single-phase and three-
phase uncontrolled diode rectifiers. The reference nonlinear
load, as described in Fig. 18 and designed according to the
standard IEC 62040-3, has an input series resistor R
s
=0 .5Ω ,
TABLE I
S
ETUP PARAMETERS
TABLE II
C
ONTROLLER P ARAMETERS
Fig. 20. Experimental result. Line current i
a
at the transformer primary side
with dc component. With the internal model of the conventional repetitive
controller. Output phase-to-neutral voltages. Voltage scale: 50 V/div. Current
scale: 10 A/div. N =84 ,andT = 198.41 µ s. φ(z ) is in Fig. 6.
a load resistor R
1
=30Ω , and a filter capacitor C
c
= 4700 µ F,
and allow to obtain a crest factor of 3. The setup parameters
are given in Table I, and the controller parameters are given
in Table II.
A. Steady-State Performance
Fig. 20 shows the output phase voltages and the input current
at the transformer primary side with a significant dc component
when the system in Fig. 1 operates with an internal model
based on the conventional repetitive controller. This fact can
be proven through the harmonic spectrum presented in Fig. 21,
which denote a dc component around 140%. On the other
2130 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 54, NO. 4, AUGUST 2007
Fig. 21. Transformer primary side line current harmonics spectrum with dc
component. With the internal model of the conventional repetitive controller.
Fig. 22. Experimental result. Line current i
a
at the transformer primary
side without dc component. With the proposed internal-model-based con-
troller. Output phase-to-neutral voltages. Voltage scale: 50 V/div. Current scale:
10 A/div. N =42 . φ(z ) is in Fig. 11.
Fig. 23. Transformer primary-side line current harmonics spectrum without
dc component. With the proposed internal-model-based controller.
side, Fig. 22 shows the same waveforms as Fig. 20 with the
system in Fig. 1 operating with the proposed internal-model-
based controller. It can be seen that this current appears without
offset, as demonstrated in the harmonic spectrum of this current
given in Fig. 23, where the dc component is less than 1%,
Fig. 24. Experimental result. Unbalanced linear load. With the pro-
posed controller. Output phase-to-neutral voltages v
an
, v
bn
,andv
cn
,and
load current i
a
.THD =0 .7% . Unbalance factor =0 .6%. Voltage scale:
50 V/div. Current scale: 20 A/div.
Fig. 25. Experimental result. Open-loop operation. Three-phase uncontrolled
rectifier at 10 kVA. Output phase-to-neutral voltages v
an
, v
bn
,andv
cn
,and
load current i
a
.THD =7% . Voltage scale: 50 V/div. Current scale: 20 A/div.
which can be attributed to sensor error. These tests validate that
the proposed internal-model-based controller does not produce
pole–zero cancellation and consequently does not saturate the
output transformer.
The performance of the proposed controller with linear load
has been tested using an unbalanced resistive rated load con-
nected between a phase and a neutral wire; the experimental
result is shown in Fig. 24. It can be seen that the UPS output
voltages have a low THD as well as a reduced unbalance
factor. On the other hand, Figs. 25 and 26 show the three-
phase line-to-neutral voltages and the nonlinear load current
in phase a, which is drawn by three-phase and single-phase
uncontrolled rectifiers, when operating without the proposed
controller. It can be seen that the THD of the output voltages
is very high, around 7% and 10%, respectively. Figs. 27 and 28
show the operation of the proposed controller with the same
nonlinear loads. It is seen that with the proposed controller,
high-quality output voltages are obtained. Also, in Fig. 28, the
single-phase uncontrolled rectifier is connected between one
phase and neutral.
BOTTERÓN AND PINHEIRO: THREE-PHASE UPS THAT COMPLIES WITH THE STANDARD IEC 62040-3 2131
Fig. 26. Experimental result. Open-loop operation. Single-phase uncontrolled
rectifier at 10 kVA. Output phase-to-neutral voltages v
an
, v
bn
,andv
cn
,
and load current i
a
.THD =9 .8% . Voltage scale: 50 V/div. Current scale:
50 A/div.
Fig. 27. Experimental result. With the proposed controller. Three-phase un-
controlled rectifier at 10 kVA. Output phase-to-neutral voltages v
an
, v
bn
,and
v
cn
, and load current i
a
.THD =0 .8% . Voltage scale: 50 V/div. Current scale:
20 A/div.
Fig. 28. Experimental result. With the proposed controller. Unbalanced load.
Single-phase uncontrolled rectifier at 3.3 kVA. Output phase-to-neutral volt-
ages v
an
, v
bn
,andv
cn
, and load current i
a
.THD =1 .2% . Unbalance
factor =0 .92% . Voltage scale: 50 V/div. Current scale: 50 A/div.
This represents the worst case with the phase-rated unbal-
anced nonlinear load. It can be seen from these experimental
results that the THD of the output voltages is very low, which is
around 1%, even with this severe operational condition. Also,
with the proposed controller, the unbalance factor has been
reduced below 1%. The THDs of the UPS output voltages
presented in Figs. 24, 27, and 28 are well below the limits
of IEC 62040-3. In addition, the individual odd and even
harmonics does not exceed the limits of this standard, as shown
in Fig. 29 and Table III.
B. Transient Performance
To verify the transient performance of the UPS output, the
standardized tests described in Section 6.3.7 of the standard
IEC 62040-3 were performed, and the deviations from the
undervoltage and overvoltage limits defined in [1, Figs. 1, 2, or
3] were obtained, as described in Section VI, for nonlinear and
linear loads. Fig. 30 shows the dynamic deviation of the load
capacitor voltage of each phase of the reference nonlinear loads
(Fig. 18) at loading steps. On the other hand, Fig. 31 presents
the deviation of the load capacitor voltage due to the removal
of reference nonlinear loads. Figs. 30 and 31 demonstrate
that the proposed controller satisfies the voltage limits under
dynamic conditions not exceeding the undervoltage and over-
voltage transient limits of classification 1. Figs. 32 and 33 show
the dynamic deviation of the output voltage rms value when
performing the linear load steps as described in Section VI.
These experimental results again demonstrate that the proposed
controller ensures that the dynamic deviation values do not
exceed the undervoltage and overvoltage transient limits of
classification 1 both in the load application and when it is
removed. Thus, this UPS is suitable for feeding most types
of critical loads with high-quality output voltages. The ex-
perimental results for loading and removal of the reference
nonlinear load are presented in the time domain in Figs. 34
and 35. Fig. 34 shows the reference nonlinear load step from
33% to 66%, while Fig. 35 shows the reference nonlinear
removal from 66% to 33%. It can be seen that the undershoot
and overshoot require no more than one fundamental period
before returning to the rated value. It is important to note that
the output voltage transient during the nonlinear load step is
a consequence of the fact that the large reference nonlinear
load capacitor C
c
is uncharged when it is connected to the
UPS output. Even in this case, the minimum load rectifier
average output voltage value does not exceed the transient
limits imposed by classification 1 in [1]. This transient can be
reduced by increasing the inverter output current capability.
The experimental waveforms for the dynamic test with linear
load are presented in Figs. 36 and 37 to complement the
information given by Figs. 32 and 33. Fig. 36 shows the linear
load step from 20% to 80% of the rated output active power,
and Fig. 37 presents the unloading step from 80% to 20%.
VII. S
UMMARY
This paper has proposed a new discrete-time down-sampled
internal-model-based controller in the synchronous reference
2132 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 54, NO. 4, AUGUST 2007
Fig. 29. Levels for individual harmonics UPS output voltages with the proposed controller and IEC 62040-3.
TABLE III
L
EVELS FOR I NDIVIDUAL H ARMONICS UPS O UTPUT V OLTAGES W ITH THE P ROPOSED C ONTROLLER
Fig. 30. Output dynamic performance characteristics of the three-phase UPS. Step reference nonlinear loading from 33% to 66% and from 66% to full load.
BOTTERÓN AND PINHEIRO: THREE-PHASE UPS THAT COMPLIES WITH THE STANDARD IEC 62040-3 2133
Fig. 31. Output dynamic performance characteristics of the three-phase UPS. Step reference nonlinear removal from 100% to 66% and from 66% to 33%.
Fig. 32. Output dynamic performance characteristics of the three-phase UPS. Step linear loading from 20% to 80% rated active power load.
Fig. 33. Output dynamic performance characteristics of the three-phase UPS. Step linear removal from 80% to 20% rated active power load.
2134 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 54, NO. 4, AUGUST 2007
Fig. 34. Experimental result. Output phase-to-neutral voltage v
an
. Reference
nonlinear load step from 33% to 66%. Voltage scale: 50 V/div. Current scale:
50 A/div.
Fig. 35. Experimental result. Output phase-to-neutral voltage v
an
. Reference
nonlinear load removal from 66% to 33%. Voltage scale: 50 V/div. Current
scale: 50 A/div.
Fig. 36. Experimental result. Output phase-to-neutral voltage v
an
. Linear
load step from 20% to 80%. Voltage scale: 50 V/div. Current scale: 50 A/div.
frame, which is adequate for three-phase three-leg PWM in-
verters that operate with an insulating transformer, for UPS
applications. The proposed discrete-time control system results
Fig. 37. Experimental result. Output phase-to-neutral voltage v
an
. Linear
load step from 80% to 20%. Voltage scale: 50 V/div. Current scale:
50 A/div.
in a multirate system with the plant plus a PD compensator
to stabilize the closed loop in one sampling rate and the
internal-model-based controller with half of the former sam-
pling frequency. This paper demonstrates that, by modifying the
order of the polynomial of the internal model in synchronous
frame, it is possible to ensure that the residual dc components
(in stationary abc frame) are not amplified, thus avoiding trans-
former saturation. In addition, it is not necessary to include a
zero-phase-shift low-pass FIR filter in the loop of the internal-
model-based controller. With regard to digital implementation,
the proposed discrete-time controller is an attractive solution
for fixed-point DSPs because it is easy to implement and has
low sensitivity to roundoff error. In addition, for DSP and
microcontrollers with reduced random access memory, this pro-
posed internal model saves the memory space that is required
to store the voltage error in a circular buffer. Furthermore, the
predictive PD compensator that stabilizes the closed loop has
a straightforward design and only requires the measure of the
UPS output voltages. The experimental results presented in this
paper demonstrate that the steady-state output voltages have
high quality under both linear and nonlinear loads with a low
THD and a reduced imbalance factor for unbalanced loads.
In addition, the output voltage dynamic performance of the
three-phase UPS is found to be very good, meeting the severe
classification 1 of IEC 62040-3, for both linear and nonlinear
loads.
A
PPENDIX
The linear transformation that converts the state variables
from the stationary abc to the stationary αβ 0 frame, and from
αβ to dq synchronous frame, is given by
T
abc_ αβ 0
=
2
3
1 −1/2 −1/2
0
√
3/2 −
√
3/2
1/
√
21 /
√
21 /
√
2
T
αβ _ dq
=
cos(ωt )sin( ωt)
− sin(ωt )cos( ωt )
. (17)
BOTTERÓN AND PINHEIRO: THREE-PHASE UPS THAT COMPLIES WITH THE STANDARD IEC 62040-3 2135
The real coefficients of the transfer functions in (10) are
given as
b
0
=0 .2276 b
1
=0 .7325 b
2
=0 .08777
b
3
=0 .2166 b
4
=0 .03064
c
0
=0 .01096 c
1
=0 .111 c
2
=0 .008563
c
3
=0 .03678 c
4
=0 .001553
a
1
=0 .2007 a
2
=0 .5854
a
3
=0 .06041 a
4
=0 .09056.
These coefficients have been obtained with a sampling rate of
T = 198.41 µs.
The real coefficients of the closed-loop transfer func-
tion G
MF
(z
im
) in (13) obtained at 2T = 396 . 83 µsarethe
following:
n
0
=1 .01 n
1
=0 .274 n
2
=0 .0366
n
3
=0 .013 n
4
=0 .0010 n
5
=2 .99 × 10
−5
d
1
=0 .12 d
2
=0 .103 d
3
=0 .012
d
4
=0 .0037 d
5
=0 .00079 d
6
=5 .23 × 10
−5
d
7
=1 .36 × 10
−6
.
Space-state representation of the single-rate equivalent
closed-loop system in Fig. 15.
Here, we describe the state-space representation of the
single-rate closed-loop system operating at sampling rate T
im
,
which has been used to obtain the sampled transfer function
G
MF
(z
im
) in (13).
Consider the state-space equations of the plant and the PD
compensator, i.e.,
x
p
(k +1) T = G
dq
x
p
(kT )+ H
(i, 1)
dq
u
d
(kT ) (18)
where G
dq
is given in (8), and H
(i, 1)
dq
is the first column of the
H
dq
matrix in (8), where i =1 , 2 ,... 8. The output of the plant
is given by
y
d
(kT )= C
(1,j )
dq
x
p
(kT ) (19)
where C
(1,j )
dq
is the first row of the C
dq
matrix in (8), and
j =1 , 2 ,... 8. The state variable representation of the PD is
given as
x
c
(k +1) T = G
c
x
c
(kT )+ H
c
e
d
(kT ) (20)
where G
c
=
00
10
, H
c
=
1
0
, and e
d
(kT ) is the sampled
voltage error of axis "d" given by
e
d
(kT )= r
d
(kT ) − y
d
(kT ). (21)
The control action can be written as
u
d
(kT )= C
c
x
c
(kT )+ D
c
e
d
(kT )+ u
im
(mT
im
) (22)
where C
c
=[ k
1
k
2
], D
c
=0 , u
im
(mT
im
) is the internal-
model-based control action at sampling rate T
im
, and x
c
(kT )=
[e
d
(k − 1) e
d
(k − 2)]
T
. In order to obtain an equivalent
slow-rate state-space representation of the plant plus a PD
compensator at 2T , we can write (18) and (20) as
x
p
(k +2) T
x
c
(k +2) T
=
G
2
dq
H
(i, 1)
dq
C
c
G
c
−H
c
C
(1,j )
dq
G
dq
G
2
c
x
p
(kT )
x
c
(kT )
+
H
(i, 1)
dq
C
c
H
c
G
dq
H
(i, 1)
dq
G
c
H
c
−H
c
C
(1,j )
dq
H
(i, 1)
dq
+
e
d
(kT )
u
d
(kT )
+
H
(i, 1)
dq
H
c
r
d
(k +1)
+
H
(i, 1)
dq
0
u
im
(mT
im
). (23)
Substituting (21) and (22) in (23), we find the equivalent
single-rate state-space representation of the system in Fig. 15,
i.e., (24) shown at the bottom of the page.
Finally, the sampled transfer function G
MF
(z
im
) in (13) can
be obtained by applying the Z transform to (24), which leads to
G
MF
(z
im
)=C
sr
(z
im
I − G
sr
)
−1
H
sr
(25)
where the matrix C
sr
=[ 0
1×4
1 0
1×5
].
x
p
(k +2) T
x
c
(k +2) T
=
G
2
dq
− H
(i, 1)
dq
C
c
H
c
C
(1,j )
dq
H
(i, 1)
dq
C
c
G
c
+ G
dq
H
(i, 1)
dq
C
c
−H
c
C
(1,j )
dq
G
dq
− G
c
H
c
C
(1,j )
dq
G
2
c
− H
c
C
(1,j )
dq
H
(i, 1)
dq
C
c
x
p
(kT )
x
c
(kT )
+
H
(i, 1)
dq
C
c
H
c
+ G
dq
H
(i, 1)
dq
G
c
H
c
− H
c
C
(1,j )
dq
H
(i, 1)
dq
r
d
(k )+
H
(i, 1)
dq
H
c
r
d
(k +1)+
H
(i, 1)
dq
+ G
dq
H
(i, 1)
dq
−H
c
C
(1,j )
dq
H
(i, 1)
dq
u
im
(mT
im
)
x
p
(k +2) T
x
c
(k +2) T
= G
sr
x
p
(kT )
x
c
(kT )
+ H
r
r
d
(k )+ H
rr
r
d
(k +1)+H
sr
u
im
(mT
im
) (24)
2136 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 54, NO. 4, AUGUST 2007
R EFERENCES
[1] Uninterruptible Power Systems (UPS)—Part 3: Method of Specifying the
Performance and Test Requirements, First Edition 1999–03, International
Standard IEC 62040-3.
[2] R. Koffler, "Transformer or transformerless UPS?" Power Eng. J. , vol. 17,
no. 3, pp. 34–36, Jun./Jul. 2003.
[3] B. Francis, O. Sebakhy, and W. Wonham, "Synthesis of multivariable
regulators: The internal model principle," Appl. Math. Optim. ,vol.1,
no. 1, pp. 64–86, 1974.
[4] M. Tomizuka, "Zero phase error tracking algorithm for digital control,"
Trans. ASME, J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 65–68,
Mar. 1987.
[5] M. Tomizuka, T. Tsao, and K. Chew, "Analysis and synthesis of discrete-
time repetitive controllers," Trans. ASME, J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control,
vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 353–358, Sep. 1989.
[6] K. Chew and M. Tomizuka, "Steady-state and stochastic performance of
a modified discrete-time prototype repetitive controller," Trans. ASME,
J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 35–41, Mar. 1990.
[7] U. Borup, P. N. Enjeti, and F. Blaabjerg, "A new space-vector-based
control method for UPS systems powering nonlinear and unbalanced
loads," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1864–1870,
Nov. 2001.
[8] A. Von Jouanne, P. N. Enjeti, and D. J. Lucas, "DSP control of high-
power UPS systems feeding nonlinear loads," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,
vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 121–125, Feb. 1996.
[9] K. Zhou and D. Wang, "Digital repetitive learning controller for three-
phase CVCF PWM inverter," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 48, no. 4,
pp. 820–830, Aug. 2001.
[10] H. Oshima and K. Kawakami, "Large capacity 3-phase UPS with IGBT
PWM inverter," in Proc. IEEE PESC, 1991, pp. 117–122.
[11] P. Mattavelli, "Synchronous-frame harmonic control for high-
performance AC power supplies," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 37,
no. 3, pp. 864–872, May/Jun. 2001.
[12] P. Mattavelli, G. Escobar, and A. M. Stankovic, "Dissipativity-based adap-
tive and robust control of UPS," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 48, no. 2,
pp. 334–343, Apr. 2001.
[13] M. Li and Y. Xing, "Digital voltage regulation with flux balance
control for sine wave inverters," in Proc. IEEE APEC , Feb. 2004, vol. 3,
pp. 1311–1314.
[14] H. Pinheiro, F. Botterón, J. R. Pinheiro, H. L. Hey, and H. A. Gründling,
"A digital controller for single-phase UPS inverters to reduce the out-
put DC component," in Proc. IEEE PESC, 2004, vol. 1, pp. 1311–1314.
[15] F. Botterón and H. Pinheiro, "A new discrete-time voltage controller
based on the internal model principle for three-phase voltage source PWM
inverters with ∆Y output transformer," in Proc. IEEE PESC, 2004, vol. 1,
pp. 2508–2514.
[16] P. Mattavelli, "An improved deadbeat control for UPS using disturbance
observers," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 206–212,
Feb. 2005.
[17] J.-H. Choi, J.-M. Kwon, J.-H. Jung, and B.-H. Kwon, "High-performance
online UPS using three-leg-type converter," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,
vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 889–897, Jun. 2005.
[18] F. Botterón, "Controladores Discretos de Tensão Baseados no Princípio
do Modelo Interno Aplicados a Inversores Trifásicos PWM," Ph.D. dis-
sertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria—GEPOC, Santa Maria,
Brazil, Dec. 9, 2005.
[19] F. Botterón and H. Pinheiro, "Synchronous frame half-period repetitive
controller for three-phase UPS," in Proc. 8th Brazilian Power Electron.
Conf.—COBEP, 2004, pp. 444–450.
[20] R. Griñó and R. Costa-Castelló, "Digital repetitive plug-in controller for
odd-harmonic periodic references and disturbances," Automatica , vol. 41,
no. 1, pp. 153–157, Jan. 2005.
[21] R. Costa-Castelló, R. Griñó, and E. Fossas, "Odd-harmonic digital repet-
itive control of a single-phase current active filter," IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1060–1068, Jul. 2004.
[22] K. Zhou, K.-S. Low, S.-H. Tan, D. Wang, and Y.-Q. Ye, "Odd-harmonic
repetitive controlled CVCF PWM inverter with phase lead compensa-
tion," in Conf. Rec. IEEE IAS Annu. Meeting , 2004, vol. 1, pp. 177–182.
[23] C. Rech, H. Pinheiro, H. A. Gründling, H. L. Hey, and J. R. Pinheiro,
"Comparison of digital control techniques with repetitive integral action
for low cost PWM inverters," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 18, no. 1,
pp. 401–410, Jan. 2003.
[24] F. Botterón, H. Pinheiro, H. A. Gründling, J. R. Pinheiro, and
H. L. Hey, "An improved discrete model for three-phase voltage-fed space
vector modulated converters," in Proc. 7th Brazilian Power Electron.
Conf.—COBEP, 2003, pp. 911–922.
[25] F. Botterón, H. Pinheiro, H. A. Gründling, J. R. Pinheiro, and
H. L. Hey, "Digital voltage and current controllers for three-phase
PWM inverter for UPS applications," in Conf. Rec. IEEE IAS Annu.
Meeting, Oct. 2001, vol. 4, pp. 2667–2674.
Fernando Botterón was born in Rosário, Argentina,
in 1967. He received the B.S. degree in electri-
cal engineering from the Universidad Nacional de
Misiones, Misiones, Argentina, in 1995, and the
M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering
from the Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa
Maria, Brazil, in 2001 and 2005, respectively.
Since 1996, he has been a Professor in the
Departamento de Electrónica, Universidad Nacional
de Misiones. His research interest includes discrete-
time control and digital modulation techniques ap-
plied to static converters for medium- and high-power uninterruptible power
supplies (UPS).
Dr. Botterón is a member of the Brazilian Power Electronics Society
(SOBRAEP) and the Brazilian Society of Automatic (SBA).
Humberto Pinheiro was born in Santa Maria,
Brazil, in 1960. He received the B.S. degree from the
Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, in
1983, the M.Eng. degree from the Federal University
of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, in 1987,
and the Ph.D. degree from Concordia University,
Montreal, QC, Canada, in 1999.
From 1987 to 1990, he was a Research Engineer
of a Brazilian UPS company and joined the Pontíficia
Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil,
where he lectured on power electronics. Since 1991,
he has been with Federal University of Santa Maria, as an Adjunct Professor.
His research interests are uninterruptible power supplies, wind power systems,
and control applied to power electronics.
... Nas aplicações onde as correntes não são senoidais, como é o caso de filtros ativos de potência ou no caso de conversores alimentando cargas não lineares, o controlador PI-SRF tem seu desempenho comprometido devido ao seu ganho finito nas frequências harmônicas. Neste caso, outros tipos controladores possíveis de serem usados são: (i) controlador PI-SRF com integradores em múltiplas referências rotativas (PI-MRI) [15], (ii) controlador proporcional com integradores senoidais de sinais (P-SSI) [16], (iii) controlador P-SSI no sistema de coordenadas síncrono (P-SSI-SRF) [17], (iv) controlador PI com reguladores ressonantes no sistema de coordenadas síncrono (PI-RES) [18] e (v) controlador repetitivo (RC) [19], [20], [21], [22]. ...
... onde L e R são a resistência e a indutância equivalentes, medidas entre os terminais do conversor e o ponto de acoplamento comum; i a , i b , i c são as correntes de linha sintetizadas No caso das bobinas do transformador serem ligadas em Δ-Y não só os valores de L e R sofrem alterações mas também as relações entre as tensões terminais e as do PAC. Em [19] e [20] são apresentados modelos mais detalhados para o conversor de interface onde, além do tipo de ligação entre as bobinas primárias e secundárias, são propostas soluções para evitar a magnetização assimétrica do transformador em consequência da geração de nível CC nas tensões de saída devido a erros no padrão de chaveamento. ...
... Fazendo z = e jω em (20) e assumindo que as frequências dos harmônicos que distorcem as correntes da Figura 5 estão localizadas mais de uma década abaixo da frequência de Nyquist, pode-se considerar que z −N = e −jωN tem módulo unitário. Portanto, (20) pode ser reescrita de maneira simplificada como segue: ...
This paper presents a simple strategy to compensate the distorted currents synthesized by a grid-connected voltage source converter due to dead-time, turn-on and turn-off time delays of the semiconductor switches. The algorithm considers only the polarity of the fundamental component of the currents flowing through the converter terminals and the values of the time delays and voltage drops supplied by the manufacturers to the semiconductors devices. The presented compensation belongs to the group classified as average value compensation technique methodology since it does not change the pulse pattern of the converter's semiconductor switches. A simplified mathematical description of the effects caused by these unwanted time delays is presented and used to derive a correction factor to be added, in real time, to the converter output controller in order to compensate for its terminal voltages. The asymptotic stability and robustness of the proposed methodology is investigated redrawing the converter current controllers, designed in dq-reference frame, as proportional-resonant ones, in the abc coordinates, and adding the effect of the compensating signal in the feedback loop using the concept of describing function. In addition, the minimum value of the DC bus voltage necessary is also evaluated to ensure the operation of the converter in the linear modulation region when the compensation algorithm is active. Experimental results are presented to validate the theoretical analysis and to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy for three different operation conditions of a grid-connected converter: (i) active power injection; (ii) active power consumption and (iii) reactive power support.
... Critical loads such as communication systems, medical equipment and data centers are usually fed by uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems in case of grid power failures [1], [2]. These loads need high quality power and reliable voltage at their input terminals regardless of voltage anomalies at the grid side. ...
... With the help of (8) and (9), equations (3) and (4) can be rewritten as 1 ...
In this study, a Lyapunov energy function based control method with output voltage feedback loops is proposed for three-phase uninterruptible power supply (UPS) inverters. The presented paper demonstrates that the traditional Lyapunov-energy-function-based control method not only leads to considerable steady-state error in the output voltage, but also distorts the output voltage waveforms. Therefore, a modification has been performed on the traditional Lyapunov-energy-function-based control by incorporating the output voltage feedback loops in the control variables. The robustness of the proposed control method has been studied analytically through transfer functions which are expressed as the ratio of the output voltage to its reference. These analytical results are validated experimentally. In addition, the steady-state and dynamic performances of the proposed control method are also tested experimentally on a three-phase UPS inverter operating with linear (resistive) and nonlinear (diode-bridge rectifier) loads. As a consequence of incorporating output voltage feedback loops into the control variables, the proposed control method offers strong robustness against variations in LC filter parameters, high-quality sinusoidal output voltage along with acceptable total harmonic distortion (THD) values under linear and nonlinear loads, fast dynamic response under abrupt load changes, and negligibly small steady-state error in the output voltage.
... The criterion for the selection of the LC filter parameters at the VSI output was to take a cut-off frequency, a one decade below of switching frequency fsw, for which 1 kHz was chosen. Additionally, to ease the digital control design and to reduce the delay of digital implementation [27], using TMS32028F335, a triangular carrier was used for achieving a sampling frequency fs of 20160 Hz. The LC filter has two functions to attenuate the output voltage ripple and to limit the high-frequency ripple current of VSI IGBTs [28]. ...
... On the other hand, the RL load was selected by the power capacity of the voltage supply in the DC bus and by the maximum current that the electronic sensor board handles at 2A. The non-linear load was designed by the IEC 62040-3 standard to obtain a crest factor of 2.9 [27]. Table 1 shows the inverter characteristics and the test loads values. ...
This article presents a comparative experimental evaluation of some power calculation methods used for three-phase and single-phase systems. In order to make the comparison, methods based on three reference frames, the natural one, αβ and dq, are considered. This paper addresses the experimental comparison for single-phase systems facing sinusoidal and non-sinusoidal waveforms in both linear and non-linear loads. The results are obtained from an experimental platform consisting of a controlled voltage inverter and an acquisition system based on a TMS320F28335, where the power calculation algorithms are implemented. The experimental comparison of the different methods for active and reactive power calculation is made in terms of accuracy and processing time in digital implementation.
... The comparison between standard limit and individual harmonic value of the Γu5L inverter at the nonlinear load in laboratory prototype test is shown in Table 6. According to Figure 20, voltage total harmonic distortion less than 0.6% at linear load and voltage total harmonic distortion less than 2.6% at nonlinear load indicate compliance with IEC620-40-3 [21]. ...
In this article, a modified single-phase five-level photovoltaic inverter is proposed with a single DC voltage source and six semiconductor switches. Compared with the presented inverters, the introduced topology has the advantage of decreased device count and the first switching frequency for high blocking voltage switches. The proposed PV inverter is implemented without clamping diodes and transformers, which leads to a decrement in size and, consequently, the weight of the converter. In addition, for the proposed topology, space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM) is deployed that reduces the complexity of multilevel modulation. In order to obtain the optimal output voltage of the inverter, the deadbeat controller is suggested as a rapid dynamic, low-computation digital control method. This closed-loop inverter is implemented in TMS320f28335 digital signal controller to evaluate the performance of the proposed inverter under nonlinear and linear loads. Simulation and laboratory prototype results show that IEC 62040-3 harmonic constraints is met for the proposed photovoltaic inverter in standalone applications.
... industriales e informáticos, los cuales requieren una continuidad del suministro de energía eléctrica de manera segura. Los inversores diseñados para alimentar estas cargas deben cumplir con requerimientos de calidad de energía y lograr una buena robustez y fiabilidad, además de una respuesta dinámica de la tensión de salida acorde con las especificaciones impuestas en normas internacionales como por ejemplo la IEC 62040-3 (Botteron and Pinheiro, 2007;Carballo et al., 2016). ...
Este trabajo presenta una estrategia de control digital para inversores trifásicos de cuatro piernas, para cumplir con el requerimiento de normas internacionales de calidad de energía para UPS cuando se alimentan cargas equilibradas y desequilibradas. La estrategia de control propuesta se desarrolla en el marco de referencia dq 0 en tiempo discreto, posee un lazo interno para controlar la corriente de los inductores y un lazo externo para controlar la tensión de salida. Se demuestra que utilizando controladores convencionales pueden desacoplarse las variables de los ejes d y q , lo que permite diseñar los controladores del lazo externo de control de tensión como sistemas SISO independientes, cumpliéndose los requerimientos de régimen transitorio y de régimen permanente impuestos por norma. Para mejorar el desempeño del inversor cuando se alimentan cargas desequilibradas, se propone utilizar un controlador Proporcional-Resonante únicamente en el lazo interno del eje 0, lográndose una estrategia de control simple y de bajo costo computacional. Se presentan resultados de simulación y experimentales que permiten validar la estrategia de control propuesta.
... La predicción del error de corriente permite calcular la acción de control con anterioridad al periodo de muestreo en que debe ser aplicada a la planta. Como resultado de la predicción del error de corriente, la función de transferencia del controlador PD Predictivo presenta dos polos en el origen del plano z y un cero, cuya ubicación se determina en función del valor de las ganancias proporcional y derivativa (Botteron and Pinheiro (2007)). Para lograr el amortiguamiento activo del lazo interno, el cero del controlador se selecciona con una ubicación próxima a z = 0, con el propósito de cancelar el efecto del retardo de transporte asociado a la implementación digital. ...
p>En este trabajo se propone una metodología de diseño del sistema de control de un inversor monofásico para aplicaciones en UPS, que permite cumplir con las exigencias de desempeño de las normas internacionales de calidad de energía IEC62040-3 e IEC61000-2-2. El sistema de control consta de un multi-lazo convencional con controladores del tipo Proporcional-Integral-Derivativo y un Controlador Repetitivo en configuración plug-in con multi-rate (MR-OHRC). La propuesta constituye una metodología de diseño del multi-lazo convencional con la que se reduce la impedancia de salida del inversor y complementa el desempeño del MR-OHRC. De este modo se atenúan las variaciones en la tensión de salida como resultado de perturbaciones producidas por cambios súbitos en la corriente de carga y la alimentación de cargas no lineales. Esta estrategia permite además superar las limitaciones de respuesta dinámica y reducir el tiempo de establecimiento del MR-OHRC. La validez de la propuesta se analiza considerando las exigencias de normas internacionales de calidad de energía en relación a la respuesta dinámica, contenido armónico individual y distorsión armónica, en un prototipo experimental de 2kVA.</p
Abstract A control approach for three‐phase four‐leg LC‐filtered voltage source inverters (VSIs) is proposed for an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) application. A filter inductor in the fourth (neutral) leg of the VSI is considered to enhance the output voltage quality when feeding different types of loads in such a system. The proposed approach is based on the modelling of UPS VSI system in the dq0 synchronous frame. First, the switching functions of the inverter under study are extracted from the achieved system model. Afterward, the control approach is developed by introducing a virtual time constant, which simultaneously affects the system's damping ratio, and a virtual undamped natural frequency in the switching functions. It offers flexibility for improving the system dynamic and steady‐state responses as desired. While the final time constant decreases the transient response time and overshoot, the resulting undamped natural frequency leads to alleviation of steady‐state error in the output voltage. The performance of the proposed control approach is evaluated via SIMULINK‐based and real‐time simulation results.
In this paper, a modified single‐phase five‐level inverter is proposed with a single DC source and six switches. Comparing with the presented converters, the proposed topology has the advantage of reduced device count and the fundamental switching frequency for high blocking voltage switches. The proposed converter implements without clamping diodes and transformers, which reducing the volume, moreover mass of the inverter. In order to achieve the optimum output voltage, the model predictive controller is proposed as a rapid dynamic and semi‐low‐computation digital control system. This closed‐loop system is implemented in TMS320f28335 digital signal processor to assess the performance of the proposed converter under nonlinear and linear loads. Analytical investigation, including simulation and an experimental result, shows compliance with IEC 62040‐3 for inverters in standalone applications.
- Jiajie Chang
- Lan Xiao
A load current sensorless control strategy using an optimized observer is designed for a three-phase online transformer-based UPS. A closed-loop observer containing state feedback is constructed based on the improved state space model of the inverter circuit. A simple feedback matrix design method is then applied to the observer according to the dead-beat control law, and the load current feedforward control scheme is reconstructed using the proposed observer. This control strategy can save three load current sensors, reduce the THD of the output voltage, and improve dynamic performance. The effectiveness of this strategy is verified by conducting simulation and experiment in a 10 kVA UPS.
- Masayoshi Tomizuka
A digital feedforward control algorithm for tracking desired time varying signals is presented. The feedforward controller cancels all the closed-loop poles and cancellable closed-loop zeros. For uncancelled zeros, which include zeros outside the unit circle, the feedforward controller cancels the phase shift induced by them. The phase cancellation assures that the frequency response between the desired output and actual output exhibits zero phase shift for all the frequencies. The algorithm is particularly suited to the general motion control problems including robotic arms and positioning tables. A typical motion control problem is used to show the effectiveness of the proposed feedforward controller.
Repetitive control is formulated and analyzed in the discrete-time domain. Sufficiency conditions for the asymptotic convergence of a class of repetitive controllers are given. The "plug-in" repetitive controller is introduced and applied to track-following in a disk-file actuator system. Inter-sample ripples in the tracking error were present when the "plug-in" repetitive controller was installed. The performance is enhanced, however, when the zero-holding device is followed by a low- pass filter or replaced by a delayed first-order hold.
- Bruce A. Francis
- O.A. Sebakhy
- Walter Wonham
For the multivariable control system described by [(x)\dot] = Ax + Bu,y = Cx,z = Dx\dot x = Ax + Bu,y = Cx,z = Dx (wherey is the measured output andz the output to be regulated) conditions are given for the existence of a controller which preserves output regulation and loop stability, in the presence of small parameter variations in controller and plant. Under mild conditions, such a strong synthesis is shown to exist if and only if the regulator problem with internal stability (RPIS) is well-posed. Synthesis is achieved by means of a feedback configuration which in general incorporates an invariant, and suitably redundant, copy of the dynamic model adopted for the exogenous disturbance and reference signals which the system is required to process.
This paper proposes a new two layers digital controller for PWM inverters, which significantly reduces the output DC voltage component. It is suitable for low cost PWM inverters where analog-to-digital converters and digital pulse width modulators with small numbers of bits are used. The controller description and design are presented. Experimental results on a 5 kVA set-up validate the theoretical analysis carried out.
In this paper a new digital voltage controller based on the internal model principle for three-phase inverters with Δ transformer at the output is proposed. A dynamic model of the inverter, transformer, filter and load is derived and a decoupling method is proposed. The proposed digital controller is not prone to produce DC components, which that can lead to the output transformer saturation. Additionally, this digital controller result in a simple form and it is well suited for a fixed-point implementation. Experimental results, implemented in 16 bits DSP TMS320F241, validate the theoretical developments and demonstrate the good performance of the proposed controller under both nonlinear balanced and unbalanced loads.
- Kok Kia Chew
- Masayoshi Tomizuka
Perfect regulation may be too stringent a condition in repetitive control. In this paper, the rigid stability requirement is relaxed by including an appropriately chosen filter in the repetitive signal generator. Lacking an internal model, perfect regulation is not assured in the modified system. The steady-state and stochastic performances of the resulting system are analyzed. These analyses reveal that under certain conditions the dual objectives of good steady-state and stochastic performances are conflicting. A high repetitive gain may give good steady-state performance, but the variance propagation of stochastic disturbances is large (extremely large for some choice of a parameter in the modified controller).
This work develops a digital repetitive plug-in controller for odd-harmonic discrete-time periodic references and disturbances. The controller presents a novel structure and it has a lower data memory occupation than the usual repetitive controllers because it takes advantage of the particular characteristics of the signals to track or attenuate. A sufficient criterion of stability, several hints for its practical application and an example are also included in the work.
- Keliang Zhou
- Kay-Soon Low
- Soon-Hie Tan
- Yong-Qiang Ye
In this paper, an odd-harmonic repetitive control scheme with phase lead compensation is proposed for CVCF PWM converters. The proposed repetitive controller that combines an odd-harmonic periodic generator with a poles-zeros-cancellation phase lead filter occupies less data memory that a conventional repetitive controller does. And it offers faster monotonic convergence of the tracking error; and yields nearly exact tracking accuracy (very low THD and tracking error RMS). Analysis and design of such an odd-harmonic repetitive control system are completely discussed. Simulation results of a single-phase PWM inverter with proposed repetitive controller are illustrated to validate the proposed approach.
- Mingzhu Li
- Yan Xing
A novel digital voltage regulation based on digital signal processor is proposed in the paper. According to the difference between digital-controlled and analog-controlled inverters, the reasons causing dynamic flux imbalance of output transformer are analyzed in detail. To avoid the infection of truncation error, which is one of the most predominant ingredient leading to flux imbalance in digital-controlled systems, methods used to guarantee the symmetry of the output of voltage regulator are proposed. And then a valid solution for flux balance by sampling the instantaneous primary current of the output transformer and introducing the on-line calculated bias current component into the voltage regulation arithmetic is presented. Design guidelines are provided and experimental results verify the excellent performance of the proposed method.
Posted by: hiediniemczyke0193139.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3219503_A_three-phase_UPS_that_complies_with_the_standard_IEC_62040-3